<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Unexpected Attractiveness of Random Broadcast Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/02/unexpected-attractiveness-of-random/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/02/unexpected-attractiveness-of-random/</link>
	<description>Photography, writing and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/02/unexpected-attractiveness-of-random/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottliddell.com/wp/?p=54#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Hmm. I&#039;ve polled this one in response to the blog (which has been a matter of debate before I think.)  The poll says &quot;Yes&quot; and when questioned more closely says &quot;Get Carter and The Abyss.&quot;  Now apart from my sad taste in fillums the Poll also said that calling Heather Suttie an eejit was ungentlemanly.  Which is probably true.  Is it that the chaps want their (subconscious) preference of entertainment to be shared and validated by their peers?  Or do they just not see the ad breaks (unless there&#039;s flesh in them...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. I&#8217;ve polled this one in response to the blog (which has been a matter of debate before I think.)  The poll says &#8220;Yes&#8221; and when questioned more closely says &#8220;Get Carter and The Abyss.&#8221;  Now apart from my sad taste in fillums the Poll also said that calling Heather Suttie an eejit was ungentlemanly.  Which is probably true.  Is it that the chaps want their (subconscious) preference of entertainment to be shared and validated by their peers?  Or do they just not see the ad breaks (unless there&#8217;s flesh in them&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Liddell</title>
		<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/02/unexpected-attractiveness-of-random/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Liddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottliddell.com/wp/?p=54#comment-85</guid>
		<description>It happened again! This time &#039;Glory Box&#039; by Portishead, tonight on the way home.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I suppose I should just be happy that songs such as these get airtime in the first place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It happened again! This time &#8216;Glory Box&#8217; by Portishead, tonight on the way home.</p>
<p>I suppose I should just be happy that songs such as these get airtime in the first place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/02/unexpected-attractiveness-of-random/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottliddell.com/wp/?p=54#comment-84</guid>
		<description>dim witted eejot - thanks very much! sadly twas not me to blame for the record ending as it did, its the way its programmed in our system. sorry to hear your disappointment, next time i play it i&#039;ll be sure not to talk over one millisecond of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dim witted eejot &#8211; thanks very much! sadly twas not me to blame for the record ending as it did, its the way its programmed in our system. sorry to hear your disappointment, next time i play it i&#8217;ll be sure not to talk over one millisecond of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/02/unexpected-attractiveness-of-random/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottliddell.com/wp/?p=54#comment-57</guid>
		<description>actually, if one of my fav&#039;s comes on the telly and I&#039;m out, I&#039;ll even video the sucker despite having it on DVD, DivX, wax cylinder....ok I made that up, but i know what you mean, I guess it might have something to do with making you feel you have discerning taste..only the good stuff lasts the test of time...I mean how many Bros tunes do you hear being broadcast nowadays?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, if one of my fav&#8217;s comes on the telly and I&#8217;m out, I&#8217;ll even video the sucker despite having it on DVD, DivX, wax cylinder&#8230;.ok I made that up, but i know what you mean, I guess it might have something to do with making you feel you have discerning taste..only the good stuff lasts the test of time&#8230;I mean how many Bros tunes do you hear being broadcast nowadays?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Liddell</title>
		<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/02/unexpected-attractiveness-of-random/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Liddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottliddell.com/wp/?p=54#comment-55</guid>
		<description>And there I was, wondering if I was odd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there I was, wondering if I was odd&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/02/unexpected-attractiveness-of-random/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottliddell.com/wp/?p=54#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Heather Suttie is an dim-witted eejit.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I used to watch movies on TV that I had on DVD, but now I have retreated into 1970s sitcom land on a permanent basis, I no longer have that problem.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Tonight, I will mainly be watching:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Man About the House: Series 2&lt;br/&gt;Dad&#039;s Army: Series 5&lt;br/&gt;Sykes: 1973 Series&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You try to get that kind of quality line-up on TV nowadays :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather Suttie is an dim-witted eejit.</p>
<p>I used to watch movies on TV that I had on DVD, but now I have retreated into 1970s sitcom land on a permanent basis, I no longer have that problem.  </p>
<p>Tonight, I will mainly be watching:</p>
<p>Man About the House: Series 2<br />Dad&#8217;s Army: Series 5<br />Sykes: 1973 Series</p>
<p>You try to get that kind of quality line-up on TV nowadays <img src='http://www.scottliddell.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: scottliddell.com @ 2012-02-09 03:56:06 -->
