<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shooting For Reference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/10/shooting-for-reference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/10/shooting-for-reference/</link>
	<description>Photography, writing and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 500k downloads and Photographer SEO &#124; Scott Liddell</title>
		<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/10/shooting-for-reference/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>500k downloads and Photographer SEO &#124; Scott Liddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottliddell.com/wp/?p=106#comment-413</guid>
		<description>[...] the short of shot you can get by shooting the floor/sky/wall wherever you go ( as I describe here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the short of shot you can get by shooting the floor/sky/wall wherever you go ( as I describe here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.scottliddell.com/2007/10/shooting-for-reference/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottliddell.com/wp/?p=106#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Interesting comments.  I have also seen that photos which may be &lt;i&gt;useful&lt;/i&gt; in some (potentially-obscure) way may get as much or more attention than &quot;pretty&quot; photos.  For example, although this &quot;pretty&quot; &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.morguefile.com/archive/?display=27938&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;water/sunset photo&lt;/a&gt; has been in the morgueFile archive several months longer, this relatively-ugly &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.morguefile.com/archive/?display=49131&amp;&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;refrigerator photo&lt;/a&gt; has nearly almost as many downloads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments.  I have also seen that photos which may be <i>useful</i> in some (potentially-obscure) way may get as much or more attention than &#8220;pretty&#8221; photos.  For example, although this &#8220;pretty&#8221; <a HREF="http://www.morguefile.com/archive/?display=27938" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">water/sunset photo</a> has been in the morgueFile archive several months longer, this relatively-ugly <a HREF="http://www.morguefile.com/archive/?display=49131&#038;" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">refrigerator photo</a> has nearly almost as many downloads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: scottliddell.com @ 2012-02-09 03:02:07 -->
