Death of the Butterfly

Category : zeitgeist

Many moons ago, I wrote herein about my tendency to flap about like a butterfly. The truth is, I never really conquered that, until now. The butterfly is dead. Finally.



Sorry pal… (click to download hi-res free from MorgueFile)

This isn’t a New Year resolution. Don’t do those. Leading up to New Year, I have been planning all the things I want to do next year. There is a list. Nothing else is allowed on that list until something completes (or I bin it in a big hissy fit). I will allow left-field antics to jump in on an opportunistic basis but only if they are clearly more desirable that the stuff on the list and I’m happy to bin something.

The only issue is that it is a pretty big list. It has to be, otherwise I’d let new stuff appear.

I’m mentioning this here purely so @manicmorff and @stuartamdouglas can keep an eye on me. And also because I just caught myself researching writing a REST API based widget dofer for 30 seconds and had to give myself a row. It worked. The butterfly is dead.

24 Hour Movie Challenge – My Entry

Category : zeitgeist

I‘m sure my reader would easily have guessed about 75% of these or more. I stayed honest and went for my favourites films to watch, rather than those I pretend to like for the purposes of appearing cool. It was a struggle, I think I need to know about 48 hours before I go as I’ve had to cut out too many good films.

The Big Lebowski
You need to get off to a flier and I thought I’d start with probably my favourite film. I think there is a Facebook group called something like “I judge people by their appreciation of The Big Lebowski” – couldn’t agree more. If you haven’t seen it, well, come now. Get on with it. I need to know what I think of you.

Just to show how great the dialogue it, it still very funny performed by 3 animated rabbits. Obviously, contains very strong language.

117 minutes used so far.




…And Justice For All
There are many great Pacino films to choose from, Dog Day Afternoon, Serpico etc etc but this has always been my fave. Probably not as famous as his other performances (although he did get an Oscar nomination for it). It’s a slightly offbeat lawyer/courtroom thing with many great moments and a fabulous ending. Top (ahem) trivia fact, when I was starting writing The Beatle Man, I made Danny a lawyer because of this film.



119 minutes, 236 used so far.
Star Trek II – Wrath of Khan
When a film is this good when you are 12, it will stay with you all your life. And, here in the (pretend) last hours of mine, it is only fitting that it should take it place. All of us of a certain vintage have a soft spot for this film. And those that haven’t only say they haven’t.

Altogether now…




( you have totally ignore the fact that Kirk had no reason to go this radge coz, unlike the viewer, he knew he was getting out of the cave… oh, never mind… )
113 minutes, 349 minutes used so far.
Apollo 13
Yes, yes, I know, I’m predictable. I’m ready for your ridicule, I don’t care. It’s a great film of a great story.



140 minutes, 489 minutes used so far. I may get up and stretch my legs.
Goodfellas
You could easily go for a number of Scorcese films but this is my favourite (as measured by the number of times I’ve watched it).



146 minutes, 635 minutes used so far.
Aliens
Having recently seen Avatar, I was tempted to throw it in in place of this. But I have to stay loyal to a film I have watched a bizillion times and pretty much know off by heart. It’s flawed, looks a little dated these days but is still a lot of fun.



137 minutes, 772 minutes used.
Zulu
I think I was about 11 when I first saw Zulu. I remember being fairly blown away by it then. I suppose now it shows its age a little but it is still a great film. It is a great story although made bigger than it really was by a need to gloss over what had happened at Isandlwana the day before. To a certain extent, the film is guiltly of continuing this. No matter, still love it, one of the first films I got on Blu Ray.



138 minutes, 910 minutes used.
Inglourious Basterds
It is incumbent with all “Best of…” type things that they get skewed towards the now. There is no reason why this should be any different. One of my favourite films of the year (with A Serious Man and Avatar) but this makes the list ahead of them just for the Cat People scene alone. Just brilliant cinema. I would love to have gone with A Serious Man but, frankly, I couldn’t bring myself to watch it on my death bed. Not without a Rabbi handy anyway.



153 minutes, 1063 minutes used.
Silence of the Lambs
This is a firm fave of my beloved wife and I. It’s the romance you see? Anyway, dunno who many times we’ve watched it but she always wins the ’spouting the dialogue’ competition ( I can kick her arse with every other film in his list ). Personal reasons aside, it’s a great film. I totally loved the twisty bit first time I saw it and, more top trivia, it was the kind of thing I tried (and didn’t quite manage) in The Beatle Man. This film made me try though.


Pure West Virginia…
146 minutes – 1209 minutes used.
Gladiator
Another big fave of me and the missus. You gotta love that epic Roman romp thing. I just wish it had been made with the original ending. My name is Gladiator…



155 minutes – 1364 minutes used.
Life of Brian
I nearly had A Matter of Life and Death as my last film, coz it’s great. But it’s maybe a wee bit too much about heaven and the like.
I liked the idea of “Bright Side of Life” being the song that sung me unto my death, so that had to be last. I also like the final irony of the fact that, as I’ve gone 18 minutes over 24 hours, I might die before the song. That’s not the only reason though. A few scenes can still make a laugh a lot, especially this one.



94 minutes – 18 minutes too much!

So, there it is, another list I’d probably change tomorrow. Really regretted leaving a large number out but I stuck to my guns and didn’t go all cool for the sake of appearances.

And with that, I sign off the blog for 2009. Happy New Year all.

Review of 2009 Goals

1

Category : zeitgeist

The time has come to see how I did against my goals for 2009.

1. Throw Some Stuff Out
As previously reported, this went well, although their remains much to do. The garage still has to be reclaimed. But work has started on recovering some storage space.

2. A Great Photo
Still don’t think I nailed it but had a lot of fun taking photos this year.

3. A Complete First Draft
I gave up on this fairly early on this year. There is now a very robust writing plan for next year and a shiny new iMac to write on in a lovely yellow study with fairy stickers on the wall. There can be no more excuses. I still have doubts about Terra Exitus but I’m going to give it a serious go…

4. Sell Film Rights for The Beatle Man
This one was only ever here as a joke. I still think there is a good episode of Taggart in there though.

5. Spend Less Money
Well, this was a largely a fail but there was some sensible spending and the house is a lot better and we had a nice holiday.

6. Lose Weight
Panic set in after going to Italy. I was back to a record high weight. So I went on a bit of a diet and it worked. I’ve taken a few backward steps over Christmas but I have found hitherto undiscovered discipline and can stop eating chocolate at will and have found a taste for muesli. Who knows, I might even do some exercise.

7. Time Division Multiplexing
Needs more work but I have a plan, so that’s a start.

8. No Alarms
Fingers crossed. We’re alarm free.

9. The Photo Project
Approaching the start of success of a sort. I got the website live and started the first projects and got an excellent response with a large number of photos donated. I’ll be building the first book very soon. Which is quite exciting really. Thanks to all who have helped and supported.

10. More Writing
I did the sensible thing for this year. I gave up. Going to start afresh with a gang of four separate things to write. I’m working on the basis that I might just be arsed with one of them at any given time. I’m already 25% through one and 80% through another so it’s not that high a hill to climb.

I’m not going to set any specific goals for 2010. As blog content goes, I’m finding it a little dull. I know what I want to write, I might need to think about a new job at some point but other than that, I’m just going to try and relax and enjoy myself. Something I’m traditionally not all that good at.

Oh, and next year, I will be mostly 40… more on that later no doubt.

24 Hours to Live Movie Marathon

1

Category : zeitgeist

I struggled for about 23 seconds to come up with my regular (ahem) end of year blog meme. Could I top the previous success (ahem) of the Desert Island C90 at the end of 2008 or the infinitely forgettable Best Album Tracks of 2007 (or the Amazon £50 challenge I chucked in at some point)? Shouldn’t be hard, some might say.

This year, I thought I would stay away from music and try something in movies. So here it is…

You have 24 hours to live. What films are you going to watch to fill the time? Yes, yes, I know, you’d want to spend your time the family/high class hookers etc but work with me here… it’s just a game, go with it.

Once again, I’ve made this take so incredibly long that only the deranged/devoted/bored will be bothered giving it a go. Again, you have to think about value for time and you should ideally focus on the films you would want to watch, not just those that make you look cool in a list.

It’s best to fill the 24 hours ( you don’t want to waste precious time ), so going a little bit over seems acceptable. After all, when are Doctors ever that accurate. I’m sure you could hang on that final 30 minutes to find out who is the Dad in Mamma Mia. Also, you would gain some time back but chopping the credits.

As an aid, 24 hours is 1440 minutes and IMDB will give you the official film lengths.

So, get a couple of big bottles of juice, a 24 pack of crisps, 6 pork pies and bucket to pee in and off you go….

Hoarding Versus Storage – A Conundrum

2

Category : technology, zeitgeist

I‘ve always been a hoarder. Obviously, I refer to this particular prediliction as collector but, the fact remains, chucking stuff out is not in my make up. Aside for the ubiquitous big box of wires, I still have the postcard collection of my youth, all my coins, books I’ve read and won’t read again, books I’ve never read and, crucially, all my music.

I started buying vinyl at the end of the 70’s and did so constantly until I started buying CD’s around 1991. I have hundreds of albums and just as many, probably more, CD’s. My vinyl has been lugged with me between houses/cities and very rarely leaves the increasingly battered storage boxes. I still have a turntable (2 in fact) but they’re far from a state that I can easily set them up. So, the vinyl provides a rather perfect embodiment of a literal dead weight.


but ain’t it lovely?

A couple of years ago, I put myself through the modern day hell of ripping all my CD’s. It took the best of part of 2 weeks but I got there. So, I now have a lovely wee NAS sitting under the TV and allows me to stream everything I own from anywhere in the house ( and two other copies on external drives, I’m doing down all that again ).

So, let’s recap:

  1. I have many, many boxes of vinyl I never play.
  2. I have many, many boxes of CD’s I never (physically) play in the house.
  3. 100% of the time in the car, I play ripped music on an MP3 player.
  4. 90% of the time in the house I listen to Spotify rather than my own ripped music.

None of this was an issue when all these boxes were just strenuously lugged up into the attic. But, since a man passing himself off as a builder came and took all my money, that is now where I sleep. The vinyl and CD’s are now spread about between the house and the garage.

And here is the conundrum. Do I keep them? Why do I need them?

The answer for the vinyl is fairly easy. I’m keeping it for HUGELY sentimental reasons. I tried ripping it with a USB turntable and got far too bored. So, for the moment, the vinyl is going nowhere.

But the CD’s? I could bin them, not that attached but, of course, the crucial thing is that, they would cost a lot to replace and the insurance company won’t go for “there was £x000 of music on that NAS that blew up until a hail of cat pee“. So, binning the CD’s would be little previous.

So, I’ve decided I’m going to keep the CD’s and throw out the boxes ( an idea I knicked from @stuartamdouglas ). I’ve ordered some CD wallets and transfer will start when they arrive. I may even do the same with DVD’s.

If you’re looking for lots of CD boxes, I’m yer man.

I suspect there will be some I’ll be too squeamish to bin. We’ll see. It’ll be interesting.

It does open up a lot of thoughts on the nature of ownership of digital media. Clearly, the MP3 world has led to a move away from the need for a physical thing to have. And, with more and more cloud based music storage solutions appearing, it won’t be long before you don’t really ever have a file either. You’ll just buy the right to be able to listen to something stored in the cloud (or more likely you’ll just ‘own’ a pointer to the file in the cloud, which is what Amazon should do if they’d bother to read my blog). This is already true with Spotify which is why I’m listening to music on Spotify now as I type. Truth is, I’d pay for Spotify, which is why they probably should make me pay before they go bust!

The Anatomy of Bottom Rung Football

2

Category : zeitgeist

You will often hear much talk about the ‘grass roots‘ of football. Minor leagues, Sunday mornings, Deep Heat and industrial defending. The phrase ‘grass roots’, of course, implies the very lowest level. And yet, there lie many levels below this.

I know this kind of thing has been done to death. But not by me.

At the very lowest end, the level of the football is not defined by the players, the leagues or the strips. It is defined by the quality of the two most crucial things in the whole game, the pitch and the ball. Any brand of football that takes the pitch and the ball as a given is, as the Americans would have it, Major League Soccer.

You see the football pyramid has a very wide, flat, squidgy base. And in this base we find real football. Yes, I could steal someone else’s description : “small boys in the park, jumpers for goalposts“. But even having a park and jumpers is all a bit la-di-da if you ask me. You see, I grew up playing proper bottom rung football.

(pause briefly to fire up Spotify and listen to this music from the Hovis advert and play while reading the remainder of this post)

The Anatomy of Bottom Rung Pitches

The first thing to understand is that the definition of ‘pitch’ needs to be redefined and made a lot less grand. Maybe ’space’ would be better. Of any shape. On any surface. Or multiple surfaces.

First, lets look at the characteristics of an ideal bottom rung space.

  1. No jobbies – you need to work round what the dogs have left behind. A thorough fod walk is essential. This may mean that you may have to alter the desired quadrilateral into a funkier shape to avoid a smelly streak on your staypress.
  2. Things that look like goals – one of the main issues with bottom rung football is the lack of goal line technology. Even in the high-fallutin’ world of “jumpers for goalposts” deciding if the ball is in is, well, somewhat vague and can lead to some disagreement Or, as Bill McLaren would have it, “a little bit of argy-bargy“. This is spectacularly brought to life by an actual story from a youth (which I’ll abridge for speed). Final of school 5’s competition. Very grand skittles for goalposts (we had real goals the previous year, I guess they got nicked). It was even at full-time, the headteacher gave permission to play on beyond lunchtime and, with the whole school watching, I hit a shot that hit a skittle and went in, sending the skittle the other way. It was the world’s very first Golden Goal* – next goal the winner. Cue mayhem. Half the school jumped on me Mel Brooks style. The other half started a fight. Members of the opposition went bananas. They attacked the janitor (who was the ref), back in the school, chairs were thrown. A few of them were suspended from school. I got a medal. Yes, this was Primary School.

    Anyway, you see my point, if you have something that makes a better job at goals, you can avoid an awful lot of aggro (especially where I grew up). If you look closely enough and with sufficient imagination, you can see goals almost anywhere. Obviously, trees, lampposts and the like make very obvious posts and offer a definitive ruling on the goal on not issue. But that is talk of nirvana. You were much more likely to get a section of fence, a patch of wall which was a different colour or the hemispherical arch of a climbing frame. All were good and were immediately commandeered by the massed ranks of footballers and anyone wanting to use them for their intended purpose had to shuffle off.

  3. Surface – obviously you want grass but if you can’t get it then anything will do and, most often, something like tarmac/pavement/etc usually does the trick. This is, after all, is how you get good scabs. And you need to have good scabs to be doing bottom rung football right. The ultimate surface? Snow. Overhead kick heaven. This week I am mostly Karl-Heinz Rummenigge.
  4. No Ball Games – invariably, a cunning network of “No Ball Games” signs will try to block your way like Balrog meets Prosser. That is so incredibly geeky (or is it nerdy?) that I’m going to delight in it and say it again, Balrog meets Prosser. Thankyou. Thing is, eventually the best of these places will attract the police. They will move you on apologetically the first time with a “C’mon lads“. The second time, the will start to get narked with a clear “I can’t be arsed with this, I just ordered takeaway” tone. Third time they are proper grumpy. In the end, avoiding the law is recommended.

To give you a great example, let me talk you through one of the best spaces from my youth, the perfect bottom rung pitch.

Where the flats ended, some waste ground started. We called it ‘the field’. A triangle of barely grass was formed by the fence of the railway, the edge of the grass as it got wilder and taller and a hill that dropped off down to the flats. Yes, a triangle. I know. The goals at one end were a section of the railway fence. The goals at the other end were, well, the point of the triangle with coats/jumpers/whatever spread the the approximate width of the fence section at the other end.

At the fence end, almost all was well. You could take corners, although you very rarely did. You see, the ball only crossed the line if it crossed the fence. And if it crossed the fence? Yes, it was on the railway line. It took a while to get the ball back. Up the fence, under the barbed wire, dodge the trains, get the ball. Bloody hell, just get on with the game. A corner only made it more likely for it to go back over again.

The trains weren’t the only peril. Down the rough edge of the grass, the thick stuff contained a fairly dense growth of hemlock**. Wasn’t much fun getting the ball out of there either.

And the third side of this sporting triangle? Get your John Robertson jink down the wing wrong and you were arse over tit down a 10 foot grass bank.

So there it is. The perfect bottom rung pitch. It’s a miracle I’m alive. As a footnote, it was on this very pitch that I did the first of the mega-rips of my right ankle in a pot-hole.

The Anatomy of Bottom Rung Balls
( say it out loud, it’s just funny )

A football is just a football? Nay not so. There are more to balls than you may think. They are seasonal. They are variable. They define demographic. Above all though, they decide the quality of the game. Let’s look at the lifecycle and some of the ball-factors.

The Filly Lifecycle
A ‘filly’ was what we called the thing that you would recognise as a football. It was called a ‘filly’ because it was a fabric/plastic outer filled with a rubber inner. Rubber inner? The key characteristic of the filly is that they followed a very distinct and repeatable lifecycle. Sometime after Christmas (or perhaps a birthday) someone would appear outside with a shiny new filly. This was the happy time. Everyone loved playing with a brand new filly. It felt right. It was a higher rung. Ever touch was velvet on silk, every volley sweetly struck, every header like kissing a rose. Sadly, Christmas comes but once a year and a new filly didn’t stay new very long. They didn’t like concrete much. The shiny coating very quickly wore off. Gradually, the underlying fabric became exposed until the ball was a sad reflection of its former self. Soft, saggy and grey; a Brucie’s scrotum of a ball. Nice to kick it? To kick it nice. You see, this was the keepy-uppy phase. All of your youthful keepy-uppy records were made with a filly in this state. The fabric was grippy on your Adidas Kick, the softness of the ball hugged your feet. You really couldn’t lose control. It literally was like trapping a fish supper. Joy. And then it rained. They didn’t like the rain. They got heavier and heavier. Water got inside and spun out into your face when kicked. And heading? Leave it out John.

Not long after this phase. A filly would die. The a gap would appear in the fabric panels and the rubber inner would start to peak out like a displaying Amazonian frog. And the filly would die, flappy dead skin hanging off, burst and dead and, in those final moments, held aloft like the head of Charles I. “Ma’ filly’s deid.

If we were lucky, it wouldn’t be long to Christmas because the alternatives were…

The Captain’s Ball
I know not the real name of these balls. I’m pretty sure they had “Captain’s Ball” written on them. They were usually orange, sometimes white and made of very robust, thick plastic. This was a good thing in some ways. The tended to last. Kept away from sharp objects they might even last a whole summer. But there were drawbacks. Catch a fast one in the thigh or face and you might well be off home pretending you’d been called for your tea.

They were cheaper than fillys too, so there were more of them around. After all, you need to have a ball to have a ball. Just don’t head the feckers, that way remedial reading and SRA Tan lies.

The Fly-Away
Ba’s burst, better buy a fly-away.
You need to have a ball. So when the filly’s deid, the Captain’s Ball got twatted on the railway, you had to fall back on a fly-away. They were light, cheap, thin plastic balls that were utterly useless to play football with. They were for toddlers. A slight breeze, a bit of spin and “whoof, it’s swept away“.

You gotta end with a bit of Archie… the top rung of commentating.

* – in a Derren Brown style, I’m going to predict that Stuart comments on this blog post saying, to this very day, that it wasn’t a goal
** – there’s a whole other blog post there

Soundtrack of Your Life

4

Category : zeitgeist

If they made a film of your life what songs would you have in the soundtrack for which scenes? It was a sunny Friday drive to work today and the Shuffle Gods chose Mornington Crescent by Belle and Sebastian. It seemed to fit perfectly. Albeit the lyrics didn’t quite work, I’ve not got a job for a Senegalese (nor, indeed, am I in nip). No matter. Had I been filming that scene for an autobiographical movie, that would have been the musical accompaniment.

So, today’s Friday Fun meme is, think of a scene(s) from your life and what song would you’d play over the top. I’m thinking more stylistically rather than literally but you can walk round an Aston Martin garage listening to “I Want The One I Can’t Have” by The Smiths if you’re not feeling to imaginative.

My film would definitely have a scene where I’m driving in the dark listening to There There by Radiohead. I’m sure Long Snake Moan by PJ Harvey would appear at some point too. :-)

Half Year Review

Category : zeitgeist

A little late, but here’s how I’m doing against the goals of the year so far.

1. Throw Some Stuff Out
Strike one! Having a skip in the drive for ages helped but I did throw out a lot of stuff. The garage has still to be reclaimed but progress has been made.

2. A Great Photo
Hard to judge this one but this year’s Sucata Split offered up some great photo ops. I am particularly pleased with this shot of Bruges. Mainly because it was exactly what I set out to get. Doesn’t happen often enough!



3. A Complete First Draft
This won’t happen this year. I’m starting to get the itch to get writing again. The story won’t go away.

4. Sell Film Rights for The Beatle Man
Ha-ha.

5. Spend Less Money
Well, we now have a converted loft, so that worked. Ok, so there is much decoration left to do but, based on the stated aims, this one has worked. Although, it has, paradoxically, involved spending a lot of money. Such is the way of progress.

6. Lose Weight
Failed, failing, fat and forty hear I come.

7. Time Division Multiplexing
This has almost worked. It has, unfortunately, given me a way of doing nothing too. Which wasn’t really the idea.

8. No Alarms
No alarms so far and some really good news too. Long may that continue.

AOB?
Well, a few things I need to add in:

9. The Photo Project
Something that I started this year, I need to get the website live and get cracking very soon. This is the number 1 on the project list for now. I have been procrastinating like a bad one… there is actually very little left to do. Maybe get the decorating done first. Feel free to help by repeated “Is it done yet?” quips…

10. More Writing
There are two other projects on the go, one fairly far on, the other at the very beginning. These will happen before the next book. I also need to think about a submission to Stu.

The most remarkable thing about this year is that it’s August. Whoosh, wallop, boing, gone.

Armstrong or Cernan?

5

Category : zeitgeist

Looks like the world is waking up again to the greatness of Apollo again. Perhaps my dull space related ramblings herein will be scoffed at less now. Perhaps not.

Anyway, I was watching some of the various Apollo/Moon related coverage last night (who’s surprised?) and a question occurred to me.

If you could choose, would you rather be the first or last man on the moon?

You may jump to an immediate answer of saying “Armstrong“. Yes, OK, he’s now historically famous but he’s also famously not all that bothered about that. Thing is, I think my answer would be Gene Cernan. Here’s why…

Apollo 11 for all its historical significance did little else than land, stick up a flag and get back. I’m not playing this down at all but, from the point of view of the astronauts they spent on 21 1/2 hours on the moon and only 2 1/2 hours outside the LM on the surface. As individuals they have spectacular, if very short, memories of the moon.

Compare with Apollo 17. They spent longer wandering about the moon outside the LM than Apollo 11 spent on the surface in total. They also drove the lunar rover. They had a lot more fun and had much more to remember. As a human experience, it was surely better?

I suppose the pseudo-philosophical-bobbins question is, would we choose a place in history over a better individual experience while we’re alive? (Not that I think any discussion of hedonistic intent is ever sensibly applied to the space programme.)

The person to ask would, of course, be Buzz Aldrin. Give that he never got the top billing he wanted (although he’s still a household name) he may have preferred the memory of days on the moon?

In the end, the desire to be the first was more related to the test pilot adrenalin junky thing. They won’t have been bothered about only staying there for a few hours (although, after landing they refused to sleep and wanted to get out asap, so the excitement of being there did happen).

Being first meant you got the squeaky bum landing and the “Right Stuff” way that Armstrong landed the Eagle. The pinpoint landings that followed (Apollo 17 was only 640m off target) were, by that time, a bit too easy from a fly-boy’s perspective. So, at the time, there would have been no question, 2nd is nowhere. But looking back now, I would wonder if more time on the moon would have been worth trading.

Language of The Lazy Football Cliché

Category : zeitgeist

With the football season over and the transfer window in full flow, there is a dearth of real football news so you get a lot of speculation and nonsense instead. It don’t half bring out the clichés. So I was reminded of an oft repeated conversation between me and @khev, there are rules in football reporting. Certain things can only ever be described in one way…

  • The Football Transfer Window always ‘slams shut‘ – it never just closes…
  • Footballers are ‘snapped up‘ – not just simply bought
  • Football managers always ‘run the rule‘ over players – they never just have a look…
  • Goals are always ‘chalked off‘ – not plain old disallowed…
  • Any clash of heads in football is always ‘sickening‘ – not just a bit sore looking…
  • Footballers always have ‘blistering‘ pace – no other adjective is allowed
  • You can only ever have a ‘sweet‘ left foot – sweet right feet don’t exist

I know there must be hundreds more… let’s be ‘avin‘ ‘em!