Monday, February 23, 2009

Blu-Ray Review : The Fall


Buying a film solely on the basis of being promised stunning visuals is perhaps not always the best of approaches. But since that is what Blu-Ray & HD is all about, I didn't hesitate in pre-ordering The Fall [Blu-ray] [2008].

You can tell that, at its inception, this film was built around the question "Where would be really cool places to shoot?". The fantasy sections have no grounding in any actual location so this leaves the director free to pick and choose his shots from many of the most dramatic places in the world. Strangely, it seems as this questioning on location ended up with some of the same answers as the team behind Baraka as at least two of the locations appear in both films. Or, perhaps more likely given the relative age of the films, Tarsem saw Baraka and thought "I'll be having some of that". Certainly, there aren't many places in the list of filming locations that you wouldn't want to go to with a camera and a lot of batteries and memory cards.

Sadly, this scattering of the location inevitably leads to the fantasy sections not being all that involving. Perhaps, given their context in the film, this is how it was designed to be. But they lack any kind of dramatic or narrative tension and rely solely on looking really, really good. Which they do. So that's OK then.

The story itself is very simple and, avoiding spoliers : A stuntman and a young girl are both patients in a hospital. He tells her stories and what you see in the fantasy sections are the young girls visualisation of the story she is being told. ( You could perhaps draw some wavy lines between this and Baron Munchausen ). You don't need to now any more than that.

Elements from her life are woven in, which would be quite clever, if it wasn't so obvious. The old "line between fiction and reality starting to blur" is a difficult one to tread and The Fall largely succeeds, only because it is kept very, very simple. It doesn't manage to pull off anything like the real-life/fantasty crossover plot depth of Pan's Labyrinth. Comparisons will be made and, while The Fall stands up on visuals, it loses out on depth of plot and story. The fantasy sections work really well because they are in stark contrast to the real life story going on behind. The Fall is much less gritty.

The emotional climax of the film seems a little rushed and, while it works well enough, it probably could have been so much better. This ties back to the weakness of the fantasy narrative and in particular, the final fantasy scenes feeling a little empty. Talking of which, it is odd generally about quite how empty it all seems, presumably deliberate, but leaving the locals in wouldn't have made it any less beautiful and could have added some depth.

Obviously, we have a linger a while to discuss the visuals. The fade from the butterfly to Butterfly Reef is just lovely. The low horizon shots are peachy in the extreme (you don't get this kind of gold from Barry Norman). I'm a sucker for low horizons and an even bigger sucker for abstract compression, of which there is lots. Clearly, its all about location. And the list of places I feel compelled to visit has increased again.

One thing that stands out is the natural, understated performance of the young Romanian actor Catinca Untaru as the little girl. She gives a very un-Hollywood performance both in terms of looks and delivery. And is all the better for it.

On an acting note, a special commendation should be given to the monkey who carried off its death scene far better than I've seen some/most human actors attempt same.

This is a good film that looks great. What the Blu-Ray world needs now is something with the depth and scope of a David Lean film that takes the same thirst for spectacular visuals and adds a more gripping, detailed plot.

Style over substance some will cry. But it don't half look nice.

Labels:

0 comments

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Personal Google Brand Measures


Let's get one thing clear from the start. I am not a Greek English Lexicon. Although, judging from my web logs and analytics, many accidentally think I am.

The fact that I share a name (at least in search index terms) with a book, led me to consider how much people searching for you online matters and how much you need to protect your search position against 'contamination' from other sources.

Obviously, this hinges massively on your name. I'm afraid Mr. Bradley Pitt of East Cheam has had it. But for those of us with a sufficiently obscure name to have a chance, can we dominate our own search space?

So, the goal is, can you secure the whole first page of Google hits for a search on your name? And, what should this be called? @clarocada has suggested "Google Self Engineered TopTenMysation". I currently have 8 of the 10. The other two go to a far more eminent, but perhaps less SEO aware, Professor in the US ( a big hello to you sir ). It helps that my book and photos are splattered widely all over the place.

I lose out big-style to many other Liddell's when you ignore Christian names. I may have been able to take Eric in a fight (especially on a Sunday), but I think I might lose out to Chuck. I do still scrape onto the first page though.

Obviously, if you have a name similar to a more famous person, there must be some benefit in out-SEO'ing them, however difficult that may be.

Try it. How well are you doing? Do you own your own personal Google brand? John Smith need not apply.

Apologies to all those arriving her looking for some help with their Greek.

Labels:

3 comments

Thursday, February 05, 2009

Photography Book Reviews


Over the years, I've started to become an avid collector of photography books. I love bookshops and the photo book section is always where I head first. Thing is, most books are mainly available online and a photo book isn't something that is easy to size up online.

So, I thought I'd try to review my photos book collection. If nothing else, it gives me a great excuse to get them off the shelf and flick through them again. There is never really much of a reason to look at them in close detail and it has been very pleasant to sit and look through.

I've only done two so far, but there are another two on the way (with more to come). You can see them on my photography site.

Labels:

1 comments

Monday, February 02, 2009

Finding Google's Backwaters


There are so many ways to get to the good stuff on the Internet. Lists, StumbleUpon, optimised search returns etc but there is a truly enormous long-tail of weird/wonderful/dross.

I thought it might be amusing to see some of this randomly, ignoring any notion of popularity or context. Sure, I could just surf about, but I had a feeling that I would always subliminally guide my own hand. So, here's the method I came up with:

I used a random word generator and took the first 3 words it offered me.

They were: concocted, measlier and peruke. ( I resisted the temptation to find out what peruke meant - I confess I didn't know )

I then created an 'as it happens' Google Alert for each of these words. I didn't want to just search for the words as they would be ordered by Google's view of importance. And waited...

The spidery nature of Google inevitably returned a distinct 'latest news' feel to the results. Anyway, here's some of what I received by email:

concocted
Cellist disease a hoax, British doctor confesses
( FAIL - I heard this on the radio during the week )

The Myth of Israel's Strategic Genius
( interesting viewpoint)

Okay, a 'He-Man' movie? C'mon, really?

( never really liked He-Man )

( and lots more )

measlier
http://measlier.net/
( really? FAIL )

The only other things I got were dictionary definitions of 'measlier'. FAIL.

peruke
A random foreign blog

EDIT: A late peruke just in!

No great surprise, turns out a peruke is an old-school wig. Can't imagine it turns up that often.

So, as experiments go, this one was largely unsuccessful. I think it might still work, so maybe I'll have another go.

Labels:

1 comments

Sunday, February 01, 2009

Luckily It's All About The Art


When it comes to reward for effort, writing a book has to feature at the very lowest reaches of the league table. Months of effort and toil on The Beatle Man and I get 46p for every copy sold on Amazon (or other sites). I'm not complaining, such is the way...

Recently, I was playing about with the Amazon Affiliate widgets (as is my wont, I like a widget) and I set up the links (on here and elsewhere) to allow people to buy the book via my site. Some kind person did and I got 50p for it.

So, 2 minutes of effort to put a link in a blog produces more reward than months of writing. Obviously, it's not about the money, as Stu and I have been discussing a lot of late, it's much more about the cheapies. So, I'll keep writing, and maybe add some more links!

Labels: ,

0 comments