Facebook Last.fm LinkedIn Twitter

Monday, June 22, 2009

Armstrong or Cernan?


Looks like the world is waking up again to the greatness of Apollo again. Perhaps my dull space related ramblings herein will be scoffed at less now. Perhaps not.

Anyway, I was watching some of the various Apollo/Moon related coverage last night (who's surprised?) and a question occurred to me.

If you could choose, would you rather be the first or last man on the moon?

You may jump to an immediate answer of saying "Armstrong". Yes, OK, he's now historically famous but he's also famously not all that bothered about that. Thing is, I think my answer would be Gene Cernan. Here's why...

Apollo 11 for all its historical significance did little else than land, stick up a flag and get back. I'm not playing this down at all but, from the point of view of the astronauts they spent on 21 1/2 hours on the moon and only 2 1/2 hours outside the LM on the surface. As individuals they have spectacular, if very short, memories of the moon.

Compare with Apollo 17. They spent longer wandering about the moon outside the LM than Apollo 11 spent on the surface in total. They also drove the lunar rover. They had a lot more fun and had much more to remember. As a human experience, it was surely better?

I suppose the pseudo-philosophical-bobbins question is, would we choose a place in history over a better individual experience while we're alive? (Not that I think any discussion of hedonistic intent is ever sensibly applied to the space programme.)

The person to ask would, of course, be Buzz Aldrin. Give that he never got the top billing he wanted (although he's still a household name) he may have preferred the memory of days on the moon?

In the end, the desire to be the first was more related to the test pilot adrenalin junky thing. They won't have been bothered about only staying there for a few hours (although, after landing they refused to sleep and wanted to get out asap, so the excitement of being there did happen).

Being first meant you got the squeaky bum landing and the "Right Stuff" way that Armstrong landed the Eagle. The pinpoint landings that followed (Apollo 17 was only 640m off target) were, by that time, a bit too easy from a fly-boy's perspective. So, at the time, there would have been no question, 2nd is nowhere. But looking back now, I would wonder if more time on the moon would have been worth trading.

Labels:

3 comments

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Attack Decay Sustain Release


At risk of being accused of the geekiest blog post ever, I give you a very good punt at the title. (Although this is perhaps more autobiographical/social history than full-on tech gunk.)

In the beginning there was only silence. As an 11 year old boy I sat at the my ZX81 and black and white portable TV* and played Quicksilva Scramble (all hail @zoupdragon) in a very quiet room. I wasn't even into music that much then. I had an old 60's boxed record player with Bakelite arm. It was ace. I played B. Bumble and the Stingers and Lieutenant Pigeon, old hand-me-down 45's from the 60's.



Other than that, the only sound you would have heard was the scream when the 16K RAM Pack** got bumped at the end of long 2 hours typing a program listing out a magazine.

Yes kids, in those days, you didn't get highly produced demo discs on the covers of magazines. You got BASIC listings that you had to type in yourself. That were all shit. And rarely worked.

I did occasionally write my own programs. In true "Wester Hailes Child of the 70's" style the first two programs I ever produced tried to pick the winner of horse races (it always picked the favourite and was a big fan of Lester Piggott) and calculated the winnings from a bet (it took ages to type in the bet, my Dad could do it quicker in his head).

The world of the ZX81 was that of Harold Lloyd. Silent, black and white and fell over a lot. But you never quite get over the first time you type:

10 PRINT "SCOTT"
20 GOTO 10

And then I got a ZX Spectrum. I was lucky enough to get a 2nd hand one for my Christmas as a friend at school was upgrading to a BBC Micro. They were the hot ticket item of that year. They were very hard to get as Christmas approached and some poor individuals couldn't get one and ended up with an Oric 1.

Wow! There was colour. Wow! There were some occasional beeping sounds. Ok, so each screen in The Hobbit took an age to load. Ok, so the keys were inexplicably rubbery. But it was (and still is, I bought one recently) a wonderful machine.

I still remember very vividly the day I got Jet Set Willy. Giddy and awestruck, we played it for hours, mapping each screen on increasingly large amounts of line printer paper. Remember, there were no save games, no chance of redemption. Each new try had to get further, you had to go better. It punished weakness. I played it so much that day I went to sleep dreaming of Quirkafleeg. It was my first exposure to what became known as the Tetris Effect - seeing blocks fall in your sleep after extended playing - long before Tetris was born. Perhaps the "Willy Effect" might not have been the best name. Now that Matthew Smith is no longer missing, he should campaign for the effect to renamed.

For all the splendour of the Spectrum and the hours I spent playing Ultimate games, nothing really compares what came after and the wonder of the Commodore 64. Yes it had a proper keyboard, yes it had a lot of great games, yes it had joysticks and other paraphernalia but, and finally getting to the point, it had the SID Chip. Everything else was a progression on what had come before. The SID chip was brand new. Suddenly the world had sound worthy of the name.



I'm not going to say anything in great detail here about the SID chip, I would do no better than to recite the information of the excellent SID Chip Wikipedia page. So go read that.

I loved the music on the C64. Remember, I grew up listening to instrumentals from the 60's and, by this time, had stumbled over Jean Michel Jarre. I know, doesn't exactly paint the teenage me as Mr. Super-Cool. But facts are facts.

The leap from beeps to full 3 channel sound was huge. It was bigger than it needed to be. But that is what Bob Yannes set out to do.

The first extensive programming I ever did was with the SID chip. It was a fairly labourius process in BASIC. You had to set up the sound each channel would make using an ADSR (Attack Decay Sustain Release) envelope. They look like this, for those who like their graphs.
The range of sounds you can get from variations of this simple envelope is amazing. Typically you would use 1 channel as a kind of bass line, one for the 'drums' (drums is perhaps a little grand, it was more of a white noise/phlegm kinda sound when I did it) and the final voice for the melody. Listen to any C64 tune, you can usually pick out the 3 channels.

Then you had to play the notes. To do this you would POKE the frequencies and note lengths directly into memory. Doing this in BASIC was extremely tedious and fiddly. It took quite a while. I once did a passable version of Smalltown Boy by Bronski Beat (if you ignored the phlegm).

I never reached the heights of the true master, Rob Hubbard. And, in particular, my own personal favourite, the Monty on the Run theme. Presented herein through the miracle of blip.fm. I can still remember the first time I heard it, in a freezing cold house in Inverkeithing. The then home of certain linguistics guru (and source of much of our C64 related fun). And for that, I dedicate this post to him. Cheers JR.

Have a listen and think "that's crap, you're weird". You had to be there. And be me.





Because of the culture of cracking at the time, much of the music was extracted from the games and presented as standalone programs with funky graphical backgrounds. I had many tapes of these that I would load and listen to. Long before the MP3 player was even considered, this music was kicking about and being shared digitally (albeit on C90 cassettes).

You may think that I am singularly weird in my love of the SID chip. Nay not so. Much of the music is still available now and there is even a band that does rock covers of the tunes. In fact, compared to many devotees, I retain only a passing, misty-eyed interest.

What I find sad about these days of ever rapid technology progress is that there really isn't anything all that new any more. It's just improvements and variations on theme. More of this, faster that. I really hope that sometime soon we get another major transition, moving from silence into a world of 3 channel noise. I'm looking forward to the next SID chip. Whatever it may be.

* my daughter is astounded by the notion of black and white TV, she asked recently "Was all the world black and white then?" Actually, it was brown.
** not a typo, that is 16K, yes
3 comments

Monday, June 15, 2009

Language of The Lazy Football Cliché


With the football season over and the transfer window in full flow, there is a dearth of real football news so you get a lot of speculation and nonsense instead. It don't half bring out the clichés. So I was reminded of an oft repeated conversation between me and @khev, there are rules in football reporting. Certain things can only ever be described in one way...
  • The Football Transfer Window always 'slams shut' - it never just closes...
  • Footballers are 'snapped up' - not just simply bought
  • Football managers always 'run the rule' over players - they never just have a look...
  • Goals are always 'chalked off' - not plain old disallowed...
  • Any clash of heads in football is always 'sickening' - not just a bit sore looking...
  • Footballers always have 'blistering' pace - no other adjective is allowed
  • You can only ever have a 'sweet' left foot - sweet right feet don't exist
I know there must be hundreds more... let's be 'avin' 'em!

Labels:

0 comments

Thursday, June 11, 2009

More Content Vicar?


Thirst for content can, from time to time, expose a lot of bland nonsense. There are sites/content authors that mistake lists of obvious blurb for content. We all know who they are, I don't need to name and shame (the list would be too long). A large part of the reason for this is the democracy of access. Many sites make it very easy for people to become content authors, which is a good thing. Except when the content purports to solve an issue but instead, to quote Mr. Cleese, is 'Specialist subject - the bleeding obvious'.

They look like they might be trying to help you do something but instead barely scrape the surface of the issue. You go looking for help with something and you end up trawling through pages and pages of the same banal crap and platitudes.


Photo credit: me from morguefile.com
Image added with new Crop and Post on MorgueFile.

It seems that, rather having any genuine insight into a problem or issue, many people settle for skipping over the top of a problem by regurgitating self-evident tripe.* It doesn't help that there appears to be an army of uber-idiots who go about commenting on these lists/articles saying "hey - that's great". Stop it. You're just encouraging them.

As an over-the-top example of what I mean (and to stop ManicMorff of accusing me of too many 'serious' blog posts), here's my Web 2.0 style, 'look at me I'm a content provider'...

Top Ten Tips for Learning to Drive
  1. Buy a car, you'll need this. Recommend getting one with four wheels.
  2. Petrol is important, try to get a good price, look online for cheap garages near you.
  3. Sitting nearer the windscreen may help you see more of what is going on but it will make pushing the pedals harder so don't do it.
  4. If you see the Google StreetView car follow it to make sure you get snapped but don't crash or you'll end up on the @gsightseeing website. Alternatively crash into the StreetView car as part of your holistic marketing plan.
  5. Make sure you find the biting point of the clutch before pulling away. There is no way I can communicate what this means to you through text but I'm going to tell you anyway.
  6. If you're going to hit a pedestrian, try not to hit a pedestrian.**
  7. Get a driving instructor who has the same first language as you. Translation adds to thinking time which will make it difficult when also using your iPhone.
  8. Don't drive with a sheep or any other livestock in the back seat.
  9. Nothing the A-Team ever did to a van is appropriate to most road going cars.
  10. And finally... the smell of lavender is calming, try to drive by fields of lavender on your route.
( I love this, "Perhaps the first necessary thing to do when trying to learn to drive stick [shift] is to simply sit in your car." & "Remember to use the right gear!" Genius.)

I promise you, you could publish Viz Top Tips as a set of serious articles and some Muppet*** in the US would say "wow, that's great, you have a unique way of looking at the world".

So, in an attempt to drive more pointless traffic to my blog...

Top 10 tips for getting more Web Traffic
  1. Submit your site to search engines.
  2. etc...
You get my point...

I've nothing against people having their day in the sun and having some articles on the web****. The big issue that it all gets in the way of genuinely useful content when searching for answers. A lot of these big content sites have, not surprisingly, high page ranks so you invariably you get them first and have to trawl through the nonsense before you finally alight on something useful. With the amount of content being generated each day, it won't be long before the shit will drown the fan with no hope of a re-emergence. Unless we all learn to go straight to page 2 of the search results. Top tip, position 11 will soon be king!

* "Self Evident Tripe" is a great name for a band.
** © Vic and Bob
*** you MUST watch this... it's still great.
**** although a post on not using the Internet in relation to self-worth is looming

Labels:

1 comments

Stumbling Through Twitter


StumbleUpon has, for many years now, been my way of finding new, interesting stuff on the Web. The stats today show that I have 'Stumbled' over 25000 times. It solved the problem of getting stuff you might like 'pushed' to you and removed the need to go looking for anything specific.

StumbleUpon always said that the more you rated the more accurate the match of pages you were given would be to what you liked. I've never been entirely convinced of this, it seems that pages you get are very much within category, I've seen no signs of refinement.

Over recent months, I've noticed my source of new, interesting stuff has shifted from StumbleUpon to Twitter. A great number of people of Twitter share an even larger number of links.

The key difference with this way of getting new content is that, rather than the StumbleUpon category approach, people you follow can offer up pretty much anything. So, rather than getting 'pages you might like' you get 'pages that people like you like'. If you get the right followers, there can be a group of people who see the world like you offering you content. Therefore you can get off-category stuff that you still find interesting, simply because they think like you think.

This means that, once you refine who you are following accordingly, the quality of links you get via Twitter is higher than those delivered by StumbleUpon because they have already been filtered as 'interesting' by someone who you have decided know their eggs from their sulphurous smell.

A good example of this is @Sheamus, I started following him recently and he provides a good flow of stuff that I find interesting. There is a demographic match (of some sort) that makes this work. On the flip side, you will follow people that offer up stuff you don't like. But that is easy solved.

The other aspect of content pushing that Twitter does well is when content providers themselves have a Twitter account and feed their new articles out. If you're like me, you tend not to visit a large number of sites routinely, so it is very easy to miss lots of good stuff. Take a site like Smashing Magazine. They provide a large amount of quality design stuff which I'd miss if it was left to me to look. But, through their Twitter account @smashingmag, I get pushed their new stuff as and when it is published.

The only issue with this Twitter fed push content is keeping up with the volume. If you don't look right away, there is a chance that a lot of good stuff could drift away up the timeline.

So here's a service/feature idea for free. Have some way of storing links in Tweets for later use/viewing. Could be a service ( TwitLinkbank? ) or, perhaps better, a feature of a plug in like TwitterFox, it could store links in Tweets from a set of users in a Bookmarks folder so you can check them out easily later.

Labels:

1 comments

Friday, May 29, 2009

PhotoBlog : Bruges


Bruges. Get a camera. Go there.

The blog here has been a bit quiet while I gadded about Europe for a week. Since coming back I've been wading through 1291 photos and this is the first set for the blog. I'll get them on the photo site soon enough.

I had been really looking forward to Bruges since watching In Bruges. It's a very beautiful place and, for the benefit of all photographers, very empty ( especially for night stuff ). You get a lot of time to shoot long exposures/multi-shots without people walking into shot. I didn't get great light during the day, so I spent much longer at night. So, the good people of Bruges kindly lit most stuff up and then stayed at home.

You'll notice that there aren't any shots for the top of the bell tower. Well, after heaving myself and my bag up 366 *very* narrow steps, they had put a bloody great mesh across the windows. That, combined with a distinct lack of breath, meant I didn't shoot much up there. I didn't get much decent of the front of the bell tower either as there was a hulking great grandstand in the way for the Blood Festival.

Still, all in all, a great location to shoot, especially at night.
























0 comments

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Twitter and the #fixreplies Issues


There has been a lot of Twitter-chat today about the change that was introduced by Twitter that stopped people seeing '@' replies from people who they weren't following.

There was a lot of moaning and groaning throughout the day and later news suggested that this was perhaps a scalability/performance issue.

Now, I spend a lot of my time dealing with exactly these issues so, thought I would burble a bit about it. Because I think I can understand the issue.

I can't be sure of Twitter storage and indexing structure so this is largely conjecture, but hopefully it gets close to explaining the issue.

For you to 'see' a tweet it has to be retrieved into your stream ( by whatever means, web, API, etc ). So, there is a big lookup. Tweets by your followers, tweets that mention you etc.

To find ALL the tweets that mention you, the search has to look in ALL streams. It would appear that there isn't any kind of indexing that can cope with this. The signs have been there for a while, particularly in the lag people were seeing in appearing in searches.

I have a very strong feeling that the weight of searching for @replies across all streams for everyone was just getting a bit too much. And the comments that "serious technical reasons why that setting had to go or be entirely rebuilt" are entirely expected because the amount of work that needs to get done to support this grows exponentially with growth of users numbers.

It will need an entirely new approach to indexing (and perhaps storage) to pull this off. Something much more akin to the Google model and map/reduce is likely, who knows.

Anyway, I feel their pain, tuning is such painful progress because it is running very hard to stay still, when all you want to do is add new features. Maybe they'll just turn it back on and get more cooling fans...

Labels:

0 comments

Tuesday, May 05, 2009

So You Want To Start A Company


So you want to start a company. Good for you. No, seriously, it will be good for you. Although there will inevitably be times when it will feel exactly the opposite. At the very beginning, the immediate problems are obvious "I need product, I need customers, I need an office, I need MONEY" and for the most part these are the things you do need and should doubtless set about tackling first. The difficulty is, that during these vital early stages, the pursuit of the necessary sometimes obscures the view of the less immediately so, leaving you exposed to accidents that doubtless lie in wait.

There is no magic formula, no panacea, nothing you can read or listen to that will give you all the answers. If there was, everyone would do it, would have done it, and the world of business would be a seething mass of overblown self-congratulation and champagne. But it isn't, it's a tough place where many, if not most, people fail, at least once. What follows is not exhaustive (and hopefully not exhausting) collection of topics that you might want to think about when getting on with the important day-to-day stuff, form filling, paying bills, picking your Porsche.

The most important thing to remember, there really is no need to fear, starting a company is good for you. You'll either succeed and go on to great success or you'll fail and will learn more than you can possibly imagine along the way.

You
Before we go any further, lets talk about the most important person in your business, you. You need to understand some basic facts about yourself: who you are; what your strengths and weaknesses are; how you react to pressure, people. The more you know about yourself, the better decisions you can make about yourself with respect to your business. At almost every stage of the development of your business, self-delusion will always be your potential worst enemy. And the stark truth of this is that at some point in life of your company, you may no longer fit the bill. Sure, you started it, you probably still own most of it, but that doesn't mean that you can grow at the same speed as it. What you did in years 1 and 2 might be next to useless in years 3 and 4. Knowing when and if you have to get out of the way is perhaps the single most important decision you will have to make. Maybe you are a business genius, you will take it to the end and exit in a flourish of glory. If so, fantastic. But as you walk along that golden path, always keep one eye on your own performance and ask yourself the hard questions, "Is the business doing the best it could with me in charge?", "Could someone else do this better?". Self-aware, not self-delusional. You have to decide what you are trying to achieve, the success for the business or personal glory? Remember, success for the business is your reward. Glory don't buy you jack.

Be careful with your ego too. Maybe you get some investment; have some money to play with. This shouldn't be seen as an opportunity to show off, offer jobs to your mates and lavish yourself with unnecessary flim-flam. The glory comes later, for now the money is about survival and progress.

Your Attitude
Tied in with your newly honed self-awareness, is your attitude and how it impacts your business. We are all very different. Some are gung-ho, some are over cautious, indecisive etc etc. Therefore, it's very easy to let emotion sneak into decision making and therefore it's very important to try and treat everything you do in a similar, rigorous manner to avoid your attitude getting in the way of doing the right thing.

Be positively negative. Expect the best but plan for the worst. Test any and all assumptions, test everything. Avoid sentences that start 'but surely' and look very closely at the implications on any that do. Don't get carried away, project for success/growth but have a set of "What if" plans that look at the how the world will look if it all goes a little wrong.

The other thing to be very wary of is fear. Fear is the one thing that will cloud your judgment above all other emotions. The times when you are likely to be most scared are the times when you need the clearest head. With fear comes weakness and indecision and whatever situation you are in, unless you manage the fear properly, people will recognise and exploit it. You're short on cash, you really need the sale. You can't let it show. No one will buy from a company if they seem on the edge. Walk tall, always.

Communication
All businesses are people businesses. It doesn't matter if you sit on your own in a locked room shipping widgets to Wisconsin, the degree to which your business will succeed will be in no small way be related to each and every interaction with the people in and around the business. So, you may now say "but I'm not very good with people does that mean I will be hindered in my progress?" There's no way to sugar coat this, yes it does. It doesn't mean you are bound to failure either. You see, depending on the situation, being a heartless cynic may be of more use to you than the warm, approachable side of your nature. The truth is, the most successful can usually do both and many more styles besides. You could make the accusation that it's all a bit of an act to match the situation and you wouldn't be far off. But before you get too near the Yellow Pages and the phone number for acting classes, at the very heart of all the questions of style and approach is one simple thing, communication. If you can communicate, however you get your message across, you're probably off to a good start. Unfortunately, this has to cover all types of communication be it verbal, written or, in some cases, non-verbal. In the course of the business you will meet people, talk to them, some you'll know, some you'll meet cold. You'll be on the phone, writing emails, business plans, endless other documents and all with the need to precisely communicate their meaning and leave the right impression.

The truth is, there's probably not that much you can do about any of this now. It's probably a little late to become a new person, to change how you communicate drastically. The vital thing is that you first understand the important role that your interaction with people has to play in the success of your business, even if that does mean employing someone to do your talking and writing for you.

Founding Fathers
OK, you've had an idea, it's a real winner, you just need to get it off the ground. But you can't do it alone. What do you do? You know people don't you? Some of them are really good friends, and they can do stuff, they'll help you out. In fact, you could just bung them some equity and they'll work for nothing, it's not like giving them equity will cost you anything and it's not as if you can afford to pay them now anyway. That's a great idea. Right?

Well, frankly, no, it isn't. There is an extremely good chance that, as your business grows, your friend will end up being as much use as something that steals a big chunk of your equity for no return. And, worse than that, the inevitable time will come when, for the sake of the business, you have to replace them. Then it gets really messy. There's a fight, lawyers are involved, you lose a good friend and most likely don't get any or all of your equity back. The very equity that you need to re-finance the business at a crucial time, so you dilute yourself, your business ends up getting owned by an accountant and they eventually remove you too for employing your friend in the first place.

Maybe that's all a little exaggerated but hopefully it makes the point. A seemingly sensible and harmless decision in the early days of the business can come back to haunt you.

All this is not to say that getting friends to help you is a bad thing but doing it on the right basis is vitally important. Making no long term promises is often wise and there are many other ways to handle the issue of reward, use share options not shares or accrue time worked for payment later. Of course, your friends may be exactly what your business needs now and in the future, in which case, they will probably understand the most appropriate basis for engaging with your company.

You only get one chance to found the company, pick the right people and always remember, friends now can easily become burdens later.

Family
You may not immediately see your family as a major consideration in your business. But life in a start-up company isn't like any other job and therefore the need for the understanding and support of your family is very important. A unsupportive family, whilst not making the business fail, will be a difficult distraction at a vital time.

Recruitment
You may stay on your own forever but very likely you'll be recruiting staff as your business grows. It cannot be over emphasised how important getting this right is, especially in the earliest stages of development. The simple fact is that most problems you will ever have with staff can be eliminated at the recruitment stage; if you get it right.

Get an agency or, more importantly, an agent. Don't worry too much about which company you use but only use one and decide which one using two criteria. How personal a service you can get from an individual you trust and how cheap you can make them. As a start-up, you don't necessarily look like a big prospect to a recruitment agency so you have to sell potential to them. One person today, could be ten tomorrow and a hundred next year. Whether you actually do it or not, almost make it look like there is a competition for your business at the early stage. Try to get the rate down and, when they have offered you their best deal possible, pick the agency you want to use and tell them you will only use them if they reduce their rate in return for exclusivity.

Understand what you are like as an employer, how you like people to be and make sure that you recruit for the culture you want to create. There is no point going for choir boys if you like to go skateboarding at lunch time. These are people you will spend a lot of time with and they need to want to work for your success. The more they understand and empathise with you, the more they will contribute to your success. In a similar vein, the work of retaining people successfully in your company starts before you have employed them. Even if you can get square pegs into round holes, they are more likely to fall out.

Networking
When starting a new company, most people often get networking wrong. There is nothing worse than a room full of small company MD's all desperately trying to sell to each other when none of them came to buy anything. Used well, networking is massively useful but there is only one thing to remember about networking; you reap what you sow. Going into it only hoping to receive will ultimately prove fruitless. Take some time to help people, even if there is no immediate obvious benefit to you, and eventually it will start to bring dividends. It is a much longer game, but certainly one worth playing and worth playing well which means remembering that what you get out of it is in proportion to what you put in.

Advisers
You will encounter many people along the way that want to give you advice. If you raise some money or start to get successful, this number will increase ten-fold. Most of this advice will be good but knowing who you can trust is the most important consideration, especially when the advice starts to conflict.

The first thing to look for is signs that those giving advice actually understand what your business is all about. Sentences that start "I remember when I" had better be in context to the discussion or you should start to be wary. There is an immense amount to be gained from war stories, examples and the sage words of people who have been there before, but you have to be sure that they are applying their thoughts to your situation and not just enjoying the sound of their own voice. Certainly, in the areas such as business strategy, the tendency for such advisers to steer you down their well trodden route is very strong. This doesn't mean that it is necessarily the best path for your business and you should be careful not to allow strategy to be guided into someone else's comfort zone, simply because they have misunderstood your business. In many ways, advisers who listen more than the speak are often best.

This can often be a problem if you raise venture capital. When you get the money it will usually come with a loss of some control and this often comes in the form of people introduced to you, appointed by, your investors. There is every chance that these are good people, after all why would anyone investing in you give you a bad person? But there is always a chance that there is an element of cronyism at work; the old boys network kicks in and you are offered a trusted pair of hands, known to the investors, friend of the investors, someone due a favour by the investors. At this stage you've just toiled for months, years to get the money so you are probably quite easily convinced of their fit to your company. But be strong and be wary. Be prepared to push back if this person isn't a good fit for you, however strong their CV appears to be. Always remember, this is about making a success of your business in the future, not about whatever success they may have had in the past.

Flexibility
There is always a fine line with flexibility. If people see you alter your vision too much, they'll accuse you of not having a clear strategy and accuse you of weakness and indecision. If you stick firmly to your beliefs, you will more than likely be perceived as too rigid, perhaps even delusional and you will be similarly criticised. In short, there is no right answer but you must be prepared to adjust strategy to maximise the chances of success of the company. Your original idea might be great, but on first contact with the market it doesn't go down to well, then get ready to flex. After all, you are trying to make a success of your business rather than be recognised as a insightful, yet flawed, visionary.

Equity
At the end of every company rainbow lies the pot of gold you get from selling the company, the magical exit. In the beginning you have 100% but, as people will never tire of telling you, 100% of nothing is nothing. It's all about achieving balance; trying to keep enough so that there is the reward you are after at the end, but using enough that you can make a success of the company and get to the gold.

This is not an easy balance to strike and it is sometimes that circumstances can take control of far more than you, but there are some basic considerations to always keep in mind.
You should only use equity to get things you absolutely need. This may seem obvious but, as we've already discussed, the temptation to give too much away in the beginning can be quite strong, especially when you are looking around for help. But with your equity being the only free thing you have to use to make progress, you need to preserve it when necessary but release it in the right amounts and the right time. Above all, don't be greedy. Jealously clinging to your equity in the thought that you are maximising your eventual payout can ultimately be self-defeating. Remember, 100% of... well you get the point.

There are two main uses for your equity: to get people or to get money. You will, at some stage, need some talent around you and, when cash is perhaps tight, equity can be a good way of drawing someone in. This is where you have to bring in some good judgment. You need to assess the potential impact the individual will have on your business but also what impact the levels of equity your are offering will have on them. There is no point bringing them in with a small percentage only to lose them later when they realise they are slogging their guts out simply to make you a millionaire and them a couple of weeks in the Maldives. On the flip side, giving away too much to someone who has not enough positive impact will cripple your ability to correct the situation later. It's a complex, yet fundamental simple balance of rewards, yours and theirs. Equity is a key tool for attraction and retention of the people you will need. But 'need' is the key word. Some skills, people are rare and special, some are more of a commodity. Only use equity for the special ones, anyone that you can replace relatively easily doesn't need to get any.

If you never have to raise any funds then well done you. For the rest of us mortals, the game, and it is a game, of equity financing is no fun to play and the rules are, at best, vague. There is one thing you can be sure about, a company on the up will do an awful lot better than one on the way back down again. Leave it too late through over-optimism or greed and you easily find yourself losing the lot just to keep going. Get it right, keep your valuation looking good and you might just get the cash boost to send you into the stratosphere for the loss of very little.

Equity can also be a major distraction. Remember one key phrase and repeat any time the topic comes up; "You have to bake the cake before you can cut it up". People who are more interested in what their upside is going to be instead of getting on with some hard work should be given a long, cold stare. Obviously, you will have to distribute equity as shares or options, but make a reasoned and balanced decision and put the whole thing to bed as quick as you can. Don't let it fester, don't leave it ambiguous and NEVER make any promises or offers that you can't substantiate.

Money
It may be self-evident that running out of money is a very bad idea for the health of your business but it isn't necessarily as straightforward to stop it happening. Especially in the early days, keeping a close eye on whatever funds you may have is clearly a very good idea. So, get the easy bits right. Be in control of your finances. Know what is going on, get a good relationship with your bank and makes sure you get all the information you need in a timely manner. There is absolutely no excuse for not knowing what is going on in your bank account; where you stand with creditors, debtors.

Always think about cash preservation. That isn't subtle code for spend nothing, employ cheaper people, it's just about getting value for every penny you use. Make sure you don't skimp on the basics. Get good, stable infrastructure. Trying to do key things on the cheap will always come back to haunt you.

A really easy way to eat up all your early stage money is to employ too many expensive people too quickly. At the very beginning, only employ the people you absolutely need to progress. Sure, your business plan may say that by next year the revenue stream and growth with be such that you will need these people. But your business plan isn't history or fact, it's a guess. So, expensive recruitment to prepare you for what might happen very often leads to a premature shortening of your cash horizon when the business plan doesn't pan out the way you had hoped. Don't fool yourself into thinking that you really need all these chiefs now. If they are really keen on the opportunity, they'll wait until it becomes fiscally sensible. And if they won't, question their judgement or motivation.

That extends to how you make you and your company appear externally. Simple things like literature, business cards, websites are your opportunity to make one man in a shed look like a good sized company. Sure, you maybe don't sell through a website, it may not be your main marketing focus, but you can use it to market defensively, to look credible, professional and BIGGER when people are seeking you out. None of this need be expensive, just realise it is important and invest the right amount in projecting the image of the company you want to become, long before you get there.

Labels:

0 comments

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Picking a Company or Product Name


So, you have an idea for a business or product. How do you come up with a name? Here's a few tips.

1. Pick a word you like and look it up in a foreign language.

There are many online dictionaries for this. Look for something memorable, that has an obvious hook and no obvious pronunciation problems. Start with the basic principles you are after, get a thesaurus involved and get translating.

2. Try accessing the pantheon.

Have a look at www.godchecker.com, search for words that you like and find the name of some obscure God that matches the characteristic that you want. By way of example, Dubiaku, "The only mortal to outwit Death" ( although clearly that's a terrible name ).

3. Check the name.

For UK company names, always check Companies House ( or your local equivalent) . Names may be available but they may be dissolved and could have died because of debt reasons etc. Probably best to avoid those.

4. Check the domain.

Always check for the domains as soon as you have an idea, do a quick DNS lookup to see if it is registered, I always use a whois lookup (like www.dnsstuff.com). Don't check with a hosting company, that can lead to the domain getting squatted. No point having a cool name if you can't get the domain. As soon as you decide on a name, register at least the .com and .co.uk (or local equivalent) RIGHT AWAY!

5. Go mad.

The name doesn't have to make sense. In many ways memorable is better than appropriate e.g. Google, Orange. Although it doesn't always work ( Boo, Monday etc ). Crazy names can make for strong branding possibilities but you have to make sure that your target market can cope with that. It has to be said, the number of nonsense names available drops every day. Try to make sure the name is pronouncable.

6. Watch for double meanings.

Albatross could be a great name, a bird that stays flying for a long time, but it also hangs round your neck! :-) Also, make sure the name doesn't mean anything rude or inappropriate in any foreign language. Tomorrow the world! But not if your product name means 'jobby' in Korea.

Labels:

1 comments

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Caution : Optimism ahead


It's good to be optimistic. And I love people with great drive and belief. But there is, unfortunately, a limit on how far a wave of optimism can take you up the beach before sucking you back into the shark-infested depths.

My problem, as has often been pointed out, is that I see reasons why things might be difficult far brighter than why they might work. That's not to say I can't be optimistic, positive even, but I tend not to get carried into shore by the wave alone. I prefer a Mulberry.

I've seen a number of situations where optimism has got the better of people.

It's tricky, but there is a balance. Yes, of course, be optimistic, believe. But plan on the basis that things won't go quite as well as you'd hoped. It is catastrophically easy to move forward on the basis of assumed success. I've been playing chess like that for years. Attack, attack, oops*. This is not, I stress not, negative. "What ifs" are a great exercise to go through. If you need to have multiple plans, then do that. Don't have a single plan that goes a bit Arnhem at the end if you don't get your way. Planning for worst cases is not negative or any admission of presumed defeat. It just makes sense. At no point during the war (or since) did anyone accuse Churchill of negativity despite extensive plans being drawn up on what would be done in the event of a German invasion. It's just common sense/realism/preparedness. Not negativity.

Those who cry "negativity" are generally objecting to their bubble of Walter Mitty-esque optimism being burst. Hands off ears. Listen. There will be a way.

There is always a way.

This post has been brought to you by Wikipedia and World War Two.

* - those interested in miltary history may also like to read the story of the Battle of Midway, a more finely balanced positive versus negative strategy you won't see... a great lesson in the role of luck too. I'll try not to mention Apollo 8 again.

Labels: ,

0 comments